Photographing wildlife - particularly birds - you never seem to have enough lens...ie magnification for far off objects. So the temptation is to add extenders, in this case a 1.4x, so here is a little test for me to see if the quality and reach is worthwhile. See what you think, with this night heron in Shatin Park, and similar crops on the images.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/618ad6_702cd385c435464491702c80e6a86723~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/618ad6_702cd385c435464491702c80e6a86723~mv2.jpg)
First shot, 700mm f11
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/618ad6_0e5106396102439eb2762fa72c0ddb36~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/618ad6_0e5106396102439eb2762fa72c0ddb36~mv2.jpg)
This brighter shot above is at 500mm, f7.1
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/618ad6_d4f48549733a4023aac32864d9a8fb43~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/618ad6_d4f48549733a4023aac32864d9a8fb43~mv2.jpg)
This big crop of the 700mm shot appears to win, but actually I can see some loss of details in the feathers and also some blown out highlights, and it is definitely more contrasty.
![](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/618ad6_4d92825b7c6649c7bc0f462772f4f433~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_147,h_98,al_c,q_80,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,blur_2,enc_auto/618ad6_4d92825b7c6649c7bc0f462772f4f433~mv2.jpg)
The 500mm does a great job allowing for lower ISO and an overall brighter image with more detail.